Re: If the shuttle were cancelled today? How long for CEV?

"DarkD" <darkd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>While its good to see the shuttle being phased out, to me the replacement is
>just as bad. Basically NASA are out of ideas. They want something that can
>go back to the moon and possibily space, so they are stepping back to 69
>technology. Where is the new propulsion technology?

What are we supposed to infer from your question?

That there exists a "new propulsion technology" but NASA is cuplably
failing to use it?

That NASA ahould have developed a "new propulsion technology" by now
but has culpably failed to do so?

That there simply must be a "new propulsion technology" because you
want more space activity so much?



.