Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:25:07 -0400
"tomcat" <jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128645977.289142.256100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Understand that this triangle spaceplane would require 'real' American
> backing. You have to 'really' want a spaceplane to . . . make one . .
> . before you die of . . . old age!
>
> Really!
You're horribly delusional. Try looking at the X-33 program and tell us
again how quick and easy it would be to build a "triangle spaceplane". Part
of the problem with such a design is the shape of the fuel tanks, which is
exactly where X-33 had some serious problems. More time and money might
have fixed those issues, but the program was cancelled because of the
reluctance to throw good money after bad.
Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- From: tomcat
- Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- References:
- Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- From: Mike Dennis
- Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- From: tomcat
- Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- Prev by Date: Re: Returning to the Moon is Folly
- Next by Date: Re: ET foam
- Previous by thread: Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- Next by thread: Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- Index(es):