Re: ET foam
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:27:12 -0400
"Monte Davis" <monte.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hdmak19jqp2a9phk3n4c2l3cs9d2pd56kh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Well thank God after nearly 35 years of development and 25 years of
> >flight operations, some anonymous genius from Usenet is around to help
> >them out. I'm sure vibrations, thermal environment, acoustics and
> >material properties never once occurred to the ET designers. So
> >thanks!
>
> You forgot to mention that the high-speed, highly variable airflows
> around the ET during launch would be kind to the "FLEXIBLE coating
> applied over foam." See, it deforms the way you *want* it to if any
> foam beneath it shifts, but never the way you *don't* want it to, like
> say ripping to shreds within a minute or two. It's great stuff...
> really.
I hope they're using Great Stuff Pro (http://greatstuff.dow.com/pro/) on the
ET, not the cheap stuff you get at the local hardware.
Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.
.
- References:
- ET foam
- From: zinyobserver
- Re: ET foam
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: ET foam
- From: Monte Davis
- ET foam
- Prev by Date: Re: Size of the proposed "new" space vehicle?
- Next by Date: Re: How many times did space shuttles retrieve satellites from orbit?
- Previous by thread: Re: ET foam
- Next by thread: Re: ET foam
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|