NASA: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
- From: Andy <andylee@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:20:01 -0500
NASA: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
NASA Team Says Inadequate Work Methods Likely Contributed to
Insulation Loss on Discovery Launch
By MARCIA DUNN
The Associated Press
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - Inadequate methods of applying and repairing
foam on the space shuttle's fuel tank probably contributed to the
dangerous loss of a chunk of the insulation during Discovery's launch
2 1/2 months ago, a NASA investigation team concluded Friday.
So much work is needed to understand the problem and correct the
deficiencies that shuttle flights are on hold until at least May, and
possibly even next summer.
NASA's Richard Gilbrech, head of the investigation team, said no one
may ever know exactly what caused a 1-pound, 3-foot section of foam to
break off Discovery's external fuel tank in late July. It was a scary
repeat of what happened during Columbia's doomed flight in 2003.
Gilbrech's team suspects workers inadvertently crushed the foam while
conducting repairs in that area, or handled it in such a way that
resulted in damage. The tank was worked on considerably more than
previous ones because of all the post-Columbia modifications.
In addition, thin lines may have been introduced into the foam when it
was sprayed onto the tank, weakening the material.
"We don't think in and of itself crushed foam alone could have been
the cause of the foam coming off," Gilbrech said. "We believe it was
potentially a combination" of things.
The investigation team found no evidence of negligence, said Gilbrech,
who is deputy director of NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia.
Workers followed procedures, "it's just we didn't really have an
appreciation for the significance that this handling damage could
have."
Numerous tests are planned in coming months to establish just how
sensitive the foam is and whether it can be easily crushed by workers.
Foam is about as well understood right now as steel was during the
Industrial Revolution, Gilbrech said.
Another possibility is that the one-inch layer of underlying foam may
have cracked because of thermal stresses, causing the layer on top to
pop off, Gilbrech said.
"We're attacking all fronts and trying to learn as much as we can, but
I don't know that we'll ever pinpoint one of those potentials as the
root cause," he said.
NASA already has introduced new techniques for applying foam and is
limiting workers' access to vulnerable areas.
Some redesign work will be required in the spot where foam came off
Columbia and resulted in a fatal blow to the wing. During Discovery's
liftoff, an 8-inch piece of foam broke off that same area. In all,
worrisomely large foam chunks flew off in five spots.
Shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said it is too soon to set a launch
date for the next shuttle mission but cited May as a possibility. It
depends on progress made at the fuel tank assembly plant in New
Orleans, which was in the path of Hurricane Katrina.
It will be December before the factory's entire 2,000-person staff is
back on the job, Hale said. Only 500 are now working.
Space operations chief Bill Gerstenmaier said 18 more shuttle flights
are planned to the international space station and possibly one to the
Hubble Space Telescope before the fleet is retired in September 2010.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/print?id=1214721
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
- From: Braxus
- Re: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
- Prev by Date: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Next by Date: Re: Space shuttle vs. Apollo
- Previous by thread: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Next by thread: Re: Shoddy Work Likely Caused Foam Loss
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
