Cost of slowing down?
- From: "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:23:35 GMT
I was pondering last night... very dangerous, I know.. Well, I was wondering
why the CEV was a larger version of Apollo type re-entry techniques.
I eventually realised that it is in fact lighter and cheaper on all sorts
of fronts.
To get a Shuttle style heat dissipation working for the higher speeds of
coming in from the moon, would be not only more difficult, but heavier, cost
more to launch in the first place because of that, and presumably more
vulnerable, as it will be exposed throughout the flight.
Also, if you wanted to slow down before re-entry, you would need more
fuel...
Brian
--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: Mike Dennis
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: tomcat
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- Prev by Date: Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Next by Date: Re: Cost of slowing down?
- Previous by thread: SSME mach diamond picture
- Next by thread: Re: Cost of slowing down?
- Index(es):
Loading