Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: George Evans <georgee3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:19:31 GMT
in article 42gnl11deqe6dclfdc4si0d0drrf0ludsq@xxxxxxx, Monte Davis at
monte.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/23/05 9:58 AM:
> "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering why the CEV was a larger version of Apollo type re-entry
>> techniques. I eventually realised that it is in fact lighter and cheaper on
>> all sorts of fronts.
>>
>> To get a Shuttle style heat dissipation working for the higher speeds of
>> coming in from the moon, would be not only more difficult, but heavier, cost
>> more to launch in the first place because of that, and presumably more
>> vulnerable, as it will be exposed throughout the flight.
>
> Careful -- that line of thought might lead you toward the conclusion that the
> Shuttle was a "failure" not because of this or that design choice, but because
> bringing a sizeable vehicle rather than a capsule back safely even from LEO is
> *hard* and *expensive* -- much more so than we thought in 1969-1972, or than
> most have been willing to admit ever since.
The concept of a flying reentry is a good one IMHO. While studying
Columbia's ill fated reentry I realized, from an aviation perspective, how
smooth and low stress a shuttle reentry *normally* is. It seems to be much
more comfortable than a capsule reentry.
A scaled down version of the shuttle, say of the size and weight of a CEV,
seems ideal and I wouldn't be surprised if that is where things end up.
The shuttle has been very useful. In science and engineering, failures are
as useful as successes.
George Evans
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: Mike Dennis
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- References:
- Cost of slowing down?
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: Cost of slowing down?
- From: Monte Davis
- Cost of slowing down?
- Prev by Date: Re: Report: NASA caved to schedule, Pressure contributed to Discovery's foam shedding, investigators say
- Next by Date: Re: CEV a Step Backwards
- Previous by thread: Re: Cost of slowing down?
- Next by thread: Re: Cost of slowing down?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|