Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: "tomcat" <jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Oct 2005 15:36:46 -0700
Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Strength per weight is a lousy measure of
> your vehicle being 'stronger' unless you're looking at using something
> close to comparable weights as you would steel.
Strength per weight is simply a formula. You can see it as 600 times
lighter than steel on an equal strength basis, or as being 600 times
stronger than steel on an equal weight basis.
By comparison, Kevlar is 5 times stronger than steel on an equal weight
basis. Nanotube fabric can take more heat than Kevlar as well.
Laminate nanotube fabric with graphite epoxy and an almost 'magical'
hull material is born. This laminated fabric could be used throughout
the spaceplane to strengthen and lighten the spaceplane beyond any
other material known.
tomcat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- References:
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: tomcat
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Glenn Shaw
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: tomcat
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: tomcat
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: tomcat
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: tomcat
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Prev by Date: Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Next by Date: Re: CEV a Step Backwards
- Previous by thread: Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Next by thread: Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|