Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:32:24 -0600
"Bob Haller" <hallerb@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:1131980988.489644.41660
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> lets not forget the bush adminstrations public comment, we wouldnt be
> upset if shuttle never flies again.
"Public" comment? Incorrect. That was a fifth-hand private account, at
least one of which was anonymous (allegedly Bush->Card->Griffin->unnamed
sources->Cowing), that no reputable media have deigned coverage-worthy, and
that no one in the Administration has been willing to stand behind.
> or that public discussion of cutting shuttle to 2 flights max per year,
> about 12 tops, mostly resupply of essential supplies, links from nasa
> watch were posted here for both of these. this would go along with
> major workforce reductions.
That was the OMB study I was talking about, Bbo. Your reading comprehension
is apparently not good enough to figure that out.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- References:
- Current status of shuttle programme ?
- From: John Doe
- Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- From: Bob Haller
- Current status of shuttle programme ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- Next by Date: Re: The Cold Equations
- Previous by thread: Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- Next by thread: Re: Current status of shuttle programme ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|