Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- From: Brian Thorn <bthorn64@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:52:18 -0600
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:24:44 GMT, "Blurrt" <nathansr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>The way to reduce the Number of Shuttle flights is to reduce the number of
>logistics missions.
>The options for alternative logistics transport are:
>European ATV "Jules Verne"
>Russian Progress
These two can't deliver ISPRs (International Standard Payload Racks)
needed for Destiny, Node 2, Columbus, and Kibo without being
redesigned to use the CBMs instead of the ports on the Russian side.
Redesign is possible, but it won't be cheap or quick, especially given
that ATV is still well over a year from first flight and Progress is
severely mass-limited.
HTV is probably the best bet, but it is still little more than
vaporware.
>Rapidly developed commercial alternative.
CBM berthing should be a requisite.
>NASA can easily persue additional ATV flights in 2007 by simply ordering
>some vehicles from ESA on a purchase basis.
Nothing easy about it. Congress doesn't like sending cash to people
who don't pay US taxes or vote in US elections.
>Similarly, Progress vehicle production could be ramped up to allow
>additional flights in 2007, maybe even 2006.
It is unclear Russa can ramp up Progress (and Soyuz) flights that
quickly. They've never achieved more than 6 per year, and that was way
back in 1980.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- From: John Doe
- Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- From: Blurrt
- Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- References:
- Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- From: Blurrt
- Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- Prev by Date: Re: Shuttle
- Next by Date: Re: Shuttle
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to Shuttle Logistics missions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|