Re: Go To Mars?
- From: "tomcat" <jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Dec 2005 12:20:48 -0800
Secret237@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I have a question ... if they are really houses then why don't we see
> the house lights at night ??
I can only guess that they might not have electricity. Or, that their
eyes are more light sensitive than ours and their dim lights don't show
up well. While the one picture does look like a house, I don't see any
neon signs, street lights, parking lamps or other bright lights that
would be noticible from Outer Space.
Just because they are Alien doesn't mean they are more advanced.
> We find animals on Earth get larger the farther North you go or as it
> gets colder.
> It is much colder on Mars, wouldn't that suggest animals there would be
> much larger not smaller ??
That was on Earth and these pictures are of Mars. Mars is farther from
the Sun, colder, and may have a much dimished food supply. Not long
ago, humans here on Earth averaged 5 feet or so. Today, 6 feet is
close to norm.
Also, according to the scientists, the atmosphere is carbon dioxide.
While 'adaptation' may have enabled them to separate off the two oxygen
molecules, it might be a less efficient process than directly absorbing
oxygen from the air. If they do absorb oxygen from CO2 then they
probably cough up black carbon from time to time.
> I see nothing in these pictures and I have enlared them ... sorry, it's
> only a bunch of Mars dirt ... dirt that I would to be standing on.
It could be you aren't using contrast and brightness alteration to see
within the dark, almost black, Martian shadows. Also, resizing -- or
increasing resolution as it is sometimes called -- may allow for more
sharply defined enlargements.
I have just added a stunning new picture to Star Dot Blog:
http://stardot.blogspot.com/
There are now 4 of the pictures that I have resolution increased,
brightened, and cropped. The new pictures show what appear to me to be
animals as well as a . . . Martian! But, as you have pointed out, the
pictures have been enlarged to the point of blurry images.
See for yourself. Rest assured that I have not 'faked', 'altered'
(other than stated above), or 'blended' these photos in any way. They
may be fuzzy, but they are not phoney.
tomcat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Go To Mars?
- From: Secret237@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Go To Mars?
- References:
- Re: Go To Mars?
- From: tomcat
- Re: Go To Mars?
- From: Secret237@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Go To Mars?
- Prev by Date: Re: ET foam "stretch marks"? (was NASA's Space Shuttle Processing Status Report, 22-11-2005)
- Next by Date: Discovery serious oxygen leak:(
- Previous by thread: Re: Go To Mars?
- Next by thread: Re: Go To Mars?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|