Re: The Cold Equations


tomcat wrote:
> Jorge R. Frank wrote:
> > Really? Where did "NASA" point that out? That 13-second number came from
> > the CAIB, not NASA.
>
> >From my point of view, whether the "13 seconds" came from NASA or CAIB
> is immaterial. My statements were an analysis, not NASA knocking.
>
>
> > > Today, we know that 'steel' would have been the better choice.
>
> > No, you don't "know" that. And stop using 'steel' as your codeword for
> > titanium; we all know what your particular hobby-horse is. As Henry
> > Spencer pointed out, titanium has poor thermal conductivity compared to
> > aluminum. When exposed to localized heating, as in the case of Columbia,
> > aluminum tends to spread the heat out a lot more, so although it has a
> > much lower melting point, it tends to reach that melting point more
> > slowly.
>
> The X-15 program had a similiar problem. Certain fittings were made of
> copper because copper was highly thermal conductive and would "spread
> the heat out a lot more . . .". The copper, however, melted anyway.
> Then they developed niconel X.
>
> Put simply: Aluminum is not a good material for high temperature
> applications.
>
>
> tomcat

Sorry "tomcat". You clearly do not have a sufficient amount of
NASA/Apollo crapolla dripping off your nose to suit these MI6/NSA~CIA
rusemasters. You have questioned their almighty lordship and pagan
saviour of their born again resident warlord(GW Bush). *** saving is
still their deadly game, and bashing the likes of "tomcat" is just
another part of their game.

You've been on their ***-list for receiving disinformation from nearly
the very get-go, and you're still too dumbfounded to realize when
you're being summarily screwed by your own kind. At best, you'll have
to make due with whatever taboo/nondisclosure info you can uncover by
yourself. At worse you could become quite dead and gone by morning.

What part of double-duh is too complicated for your still dumbfounded
brain to understand that our NASA is every bit into their grand
ruse/sting of the century.

There's no question that pound per pound is where aluminum makes for a
rather poor structural alloy application between yourself and such a
wide area or zone of reentry fire. However, this Usenet forum that
sucks and blows isn't where you'll find any support. Other super-alloys
(as having been used on the extremely old SR-71) have proven to being
superior. Along with basalt composites, stopping most forms of radiant
and conductive modes of heat transfer is simple, reliable, of low cost
and otherwise weight effective. Adding layers of ceramic fibers and/or
balloons is simply obvious. A 100% composite inner/primary hull as
having a few thin metallic (plasma applied) layers where necessary
seems rather obvious.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~

Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord(GW Bush).
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Loading