Re: WTF?


Bob Haller wrote:
> <Just as in Columbia, the engineers had ample data that there was a
> problem. The specs are in plain black and white; "NO leakage, NO
> burnthrough" and "NO impacts on tile or RCC". Despite leakage,
> despite impacts, despite ongoing out of specification operations -
> there is no documentary evidence that any engineer made any attempt to
> clearly inform management of the risks. > derek>
>
> Derek OBVIOUSLY you missed the flight where the wing nearly burned
> thru, years before Columbia!

Wha?

-A.L.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: WTF?
    ... the engineers had ample data that there was a ... The specs are in plain black and white; "NO leakage, ... Derek OBVIOUSLY you missed the flight where the wing nearly burned ... thru, years before Columbia! ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: WTF?
    ... >> Becoming an accomplice means one shoulders a portion of the ... >not an accomplice, Derek. ... Either the engineers knew ... >Then you need to spend a bit more time learning how those real life flesh ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: WTF?
    ... except for the Thiokol and Marshall engineers who expressed extreme ... >>your engineer's hat and put on your manager's hat". ... not an accomplice, Derek. ... Then you need to spend a bit more time learning how those real life flesh ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: WTF?
    ... You MUST be in management somewhere, Derek... ... perhaps the engineers should've made more noise. ... > Ever heard the phrase "the buck stops here?" ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: "Fireworks" Mr. Griffin???
    ... "Engineers presented their information badly" ... Already done - by Edward Tufte twenty odd years ago. ... As Derek and I cite the same reference. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)