Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:24:37 -0600
KURYER <KURYER.21svln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:KURYER.21svln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> Hello !!!
> I think there else is an interesting thing connected with New Horizons
> Mission. NASA is planning the probe to work much longer than Voyager.
> However, It asserts that the core of its reactor to be much lighter
> than the Voyager's.
> Can anybody tell me what way NASA did that?
New Horizons' instruments draw less power than Voyager's, so they can
stretch a smaller power supply longer.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: KURYER
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- References:
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Katipo
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Dale
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: KURYER
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Prev by Date: Re: Pluto - New Horizons PreLaunch Conference / Launch NASA TV
- Next by Date: Re: With shuttle's fate largely sealed,does that mean winged spaceship is dead,and will remain dead in the forseeable future?
- Previous by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Next by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
