Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:03:00 -0600
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:24:37 -0600, Jorge R. Frank wrote
(in article <Xns974F42CBBFEFjrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
> KURYER <KURYER.21svln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:KURYER.21svln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>>
>> Hello !!!
>> I think there else is an interesting thing connected with New Horizons
>> Mission. NASA is planning the probe to work much longer than Voyager.
>> However, It asserts that the core of its reactor to be much lighter
>> than the Voyager's.
>> Can anybody tell me what way NASA did that?
>
> New Horizons' instruments draw less power than Voyager's, so they can
> stretch a smaller power supply longer.
>
>
I'd have expected someone to have jumped on this already - it's not a
"reactor" , it's an RTG. Aside from that, what Jorge said.
--
Herb
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
~ RAH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Neil Gerace
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- References:
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Katipo
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Dale
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: KURYER
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Prev by Date: Re: Griffin to BBC: foam problem now fully understood
- Next by Date: New Horizons off for today
- Previous by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Next by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|