Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:12:47 -0600
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:46:52 -0600, JUSTIN PENNELLA wrote
(in article <MWwzf.18990$US3.4767@trnddc04>):
> I have a question: Why only do a fly-by with the New Horizons spacecraft? I
> know the capabilities of this spacecraft are light years beyond the Voyagers
> and Pioneers (in terms of fly-bys), but why not just go ahead and put the
> craft into orbit around Pluto for long term study?
Because the spacecraft would have to take a substantial propulsion
system and propellants to perform the orbital insertion. That would
drive up the mass of the mission to such an extent that it couldn't be
launched to Pluto for arrival in a reasonable period of time (bearing
in mind it's already going to take 9 years). You'd have to launch it
on a much slower, much longer-term mission. That, in turn, means that
the RTG would have to be either bigger or will be that much less
powerful on arrival at Pluto.
The mission is one of pretty serious tradeoffs, no question.
--
Herb
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
~ RAH
.
- References:
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Katipo
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Dale
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: KURYER
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: Neil Gerace
- Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- From: JUSTIN PENNELLA
- New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Prev by Date: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Next by Date: Re: Pluto - New Horizons PreLaunch Conference / Launch NASA TV
- Previous by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Next by thread: Re: New Horizons Mission Two Pluto
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|