Re: National Aerospace Plane (X-30) announced 20 years ago
- From: "Brian Gaff" <briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:01:59 GMT
So, could the inside of winged areas be used for part of the equipment you
need, thus making the rest lighter?
I think that the Shuttle will go down in history as a vehicle which gave a
lot of information to the industry, I just hope its not forgotten. True
reusability is not as easy as it may seem when you have to take everything
apart every time you get back.
Brian
--
Brian's Gmail account
brian1gaff@xxxxxxxxx
"tomcat" <jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143303892.513936.321030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Malcolm Street wrote:
Ian Woollard wrote:
mike Williamson wrote:
The big downside of wings is after you leave the atmosphere- wings push
up dry mass, and then it is very easy to lose everything that was
gained during ascent and then some; a good mass ratio is essential
particularly toward the end of the burn.
Mike
Which is another excellent reason to look at TSTO rather than STSO with
current technology.
--
Malcolm Street
Canberra, Australia
The nation's capital
Why not use a 'lighter than air' waverider?
tomcat
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Riding Rockets and Challenger (Mullane Book)
- Next by Date: GO FEVER IS WELL ENTRENTCHED:(
- Previous by thread: Re: National Aerospace Plane (X-30) announced 20 years ago
- Next by thread: Re: National Aerospace Plane (X-30) announced 20 years ago
- Index(es):