Re: On the Subject of Ice

tomcat; Once again, Brad, if you have a Saturn V then why attempt a
"grand ruse/sting"? There was no "grand ruse/sting". America built
10 Saturn V rockets.
Other than the usual infomercial-science hype worth, what the freaking
hell has "America built 10 Saturn V rockets" got to do with our
supposedly having safely landed upon and having returned without a
scratch from the moon?

Once again, tomcat, having the Saturn fly-by-rocket capability of
getting a few tonnes of what was mostly if not an entirely of their
robotic capable payload(s) so quickly into orbiting our moon is not
quite the same cigar as to what the supposed Apollo tonnage amounted
to, or of what their absolutely inert massive Apollo missions were
supposedly all about. Besides, as I've said so many times before,
orbiting the moon along with a live crew is still as of today going to
remain as risky business though NOT nearly as risky as for having to
safely land upon and returning from that nasty lunar surface as of
nearly 4 decades ago, and to think without so much as a scratch nor
hardly picking up a spare rad of radiation dosage, or of otherwise
obtaining an unfiltered Kodak moment without such naked photopraphic
efforts having so much as recorded any spectrum skew or hint whatsoever
of there being any extra near-UV and/or horrific UV-a illumination
impact that just doesn't add up, now does it?

Obviously you're so pathetic that you know not of a damn thing about
Kodak film, thus your're worse than just dumb and dumber, and thereby
so much worse off than being dumbfounded simply because you're so
easily snookered at the drop of a hat. For Christ on another stick,
tomcat, we still don't have a viable fly-by-rocket lander. Good grief,
what absolute born-again pagan denial you have, and of having only
infomercial-science to show for it all.

Getting that hefty three man package to/from LL-1 was however entirely
Saturn 5 doable with energy to spare of what their inert massive
Saturn-V had within it's absolutely massive (meaning inert heavy)
rocket-***. Meaning that it was entirely possible to make LL-1 with
enough reserves for sending ahead the critical portion of what their
missions intended (with or w/o crew) for orbiting and for their
otherwise honest attempts at robotic soft-landings upon our moon.
Robotic landing efforts are unfortunately NOT the same as a manned
landing.

Within the all-knowing good book of "tomcat'; how many lies is our
NASA (aka MI6~NSA/CIA/DoD) permitted to tell us before they're
reclassified by yourself as being liars? Aparently that number of lies
may exceed 100 (much like your LLPOF GW Bush) before reaching any
red-line of when they've officially become certified liars according to
the "tomcat" high standards and accountability score card of your "so
what's the difference" policy.

Where if ever have I even once suggested that we didn't honestly try
every last good and bad trick within our Third Reich engineered books
of such fly-by-rocket science, as to making those Apollo missions
happen? I'm absolutely certain them dirty rotten Russians with their
very own Third Reich rocket-scientists were making the same best
efforts, though without their risking astronaut certain death is why
they focused upon their AI/robotic landers wich also failed each and
every time (at least there's still not proof otherwise).

It is 'my belief' that NASA is going to take so long to get back to the
Moon because Top Levels of the U.S. Government don't want to irritate
the Aliens that are mining OUR Moon.
We'll need to obtain a whole lot better pictures than what you've
uncovered, such as what KECK can easily accomplish, as offering better
than 1.0 m/pixel if they'll simply mask off 90% of each of their 36
primary mirrors and utilized their f40 secondary mirror as is upon
their newest CCD. BTW; I'm fairly certain that's also of what has been
going on with regard to Venus, whereas ET's having been mining our
nextdoor planet right under our brown-noses and otherwise as being
every bit as plain as day to our incest cloned and mostly pagan eyes
that are so bigoted that we can only see the likes of WMD as hidden
under every oily Muslim rock.

The United States Air Force needs to be charged with the responsibility
of keeping the Moon available for U.S. use.
I believe that daunting task of defending Earth from ourselves, from
whatever ETs as well as from NEOs is well underway of being
accommodated by China; thus far free of charge.

The United States has 'black programs' for exactly such a contingency.
These programs have cost the American taxpayers countless billions of
dollars.
Don't be so gosh darn modest. Try thinking in terms of our mostly
Pro-White Programs having cost us trillions upon trillions of hard
earned loot, and of countless hundreds of thousands (over the decades
worthy of millions+) of innocent souls that got ignored in their times
of need or merely got in our mutually perpetrated cold-war way, not to
mention our artificially produced global warming fiasco and our having
recently and actually for the second time in recent history having more
than doubled the cost of fossil energy within just half a decade.
Isn't that the best ever global collateral damage and carnage, or what?

The U.S. has been pretending to be an 'old granny' long enough. It is
time for 'old granny' to teach those 'little red riding hoods' a
lesson.
I'm game for that. Which general direction of Washington DC should I
be pointing my battery of lose cannons?
-
Brad Guth

.

Quantcast