Re: Why the hell isn't this a no-brainer?
- From: "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 06:27:37 GMT
Well, I think they did so much testing on this tank that they are confident
that only small areas such as this can possibly come off.
I'm just glad its not my decision. Sometimes people can be right, sometimes
not, and I suppose it comes down to dealing with experience versus absolute
complete confidence, but then, the latter can never be found!
Brian
--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Andy MacAskill" <macslaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:K%hqg.37$0Y6.14@xxxxxxxxxxx
Don't take chances. Don't launch.
And I'm no expert.
.
- References:
- Why the hell isn't this a no-brainer?
- From: Andy MacAskill
- Why the hell isn't this a no-brainer?
- Prev by Date: Re: A little vague?
- Next by Date: Re: after the next accident...
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the hell isn't this a no-brainer?
- Next by thread: Re: Why the hell isn't this a no-brainer?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
