Re: A Nice Little Sub-Orbital Runabout
- From: dg411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andre Lieven)
- Date: 7 Jul 2006 02:03:01 GMT
"tomcat" (jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
Andre Lieven wrote:
Building a thing that *no one wants to pay for* is a great path
to bankruptcy.
And, your deep and wide inability to understand is likely a result
of over-Guthiness.
The sub-orbital runabout could be used for fare paying passengers or
for orbital (with more engines) satellite insertions. Either one will
make money, big money.
No proof offered ? Insane loon fanboi wanker claim fails.
Add enough engines and it will make Venus. Brad Guth likes that idea.
Well, you would know, being a Guth class lunatic.
Andre
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Nice Little Sub-Orbital Runabout
- From: tomcat
- Re: A Nice Little Sub-Orbital Runabout
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on camera lights
- Next by Date: Re: Is NASA-TV still available on EchoStar7?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Nice Little Sub-Orbital Runabout
- Next by thread: Re: A Nice Little Sub-Orbital Runabout
- Index(es):