Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- From: OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:29:56 -0500
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:12:13 +0200, André, PE1PQX
<pe1pqx_geenviagra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Danny Dot gebruikte zijn klavier om te schrijven :
I have just read that an active member of this group is visually impaired and<snipped>
top posting is better for voice readback for this person. Is this true? If
it is, I will become a top poster and I hope all will do the same.
I think the visual impaired person is the best person to answer this,
if he/she think top-posting is better, than I also suggest for all of
us to top-post.
....With all respect for the disabled, top-posting is *NOT* efficient
for the rest of us. Doing so will wind up having you killfiled about
as quick as trolling.
Which, of course, is why Danny the Dipdot has been killfiled by many.
Not because of top-posting, but because he's a retarded troll...
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- References:
- OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- From: André , PE1PQX
- OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- Prev by Date: Shuttle Crew KICKING ASS
- Next by Date: Why do we have LOS, when we have all these TDRSes?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- Next by thread: Re: OT Top vs. Bottom posting for the disabled?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
