Re: SRB cams - *Four* of'em now??

OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:i25mg2hng7qj11dsochhbg9se8q7fc24vj@xxxxxxx:

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:28:46 -0500, "Jorge R. Frank"
<jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...I'm surprised you didn't remember my posts on the STS-121 clips,
including the composite. Hell, I even did an entry on OMBlog on it.
Read what I posted, Jorge - what surprised me were those
aft-pointing cams on the SRBs, not the ones that are on the ET.
Those aft SRB cams were the views I hadn't seen before,

No, OM, you've seen them. The aft-pointing SRB cameras *were* the ones
in the composite view. There is only one aft-pointing ET camera, not
two.

...I've got to pull up higher-quality versions of the STS-121
clips,then. IIRC, the aft views weren't on the SRBs in that quad
composite, but on the ET.

I'll agree that the initial set of encodes from the SRB cameras on 115 are
much higher quality than the ones from 121. I think that's just part of the
learning curve for the folks who are doing the encoding for the public
releases.


--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.

Relevant Pages