Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:54:21 -0500
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:13:38 -0500, Dr John Stockton wrote
(in article <qpomWQECexCFFwoZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Rightly so. Both NASA and you should be able to multiply 25.4 by 12 and get
the *exact* value of 304.8 mm for an Imperial Foot (and say 300 mm when
appropriate).
The value of 304.7999 can be obtained by doing the calculation in IEEE
Doubles (25.4 cannot be represented exactly in a Double) and then truncating
instead of rounding to the desired number of digits.
More to the point (and at risk of puncturing an apparently-smug
SI-superiority complex), how often is a computation error of such
magnitude at all relevant in any project where measurements on the
scale of feet are used? Hint: not very many. The solution (besides
rigorous cross-checking) is a well-established set of dimensioning and
tolerancing standards for the drawings, skilled drafters and checkers,
and engineers who actually *think* about what they're doing.
--
Herb Schaltegger
"You can run on for a long time . . . sooner or later, God'll cut you
down." - Johnny Cash
<http://www.angryherb.net>
.
- References:
- Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: vag-com
- Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: John A. Weeks III
- Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: John A. Weeks III
- Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Question about shuttle / ISS
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to release the SRBs before they burn out?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it possible to release the SRBs before they burn out?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- Next by thread: Re: Question about shuttle / ISS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|