Re: Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- From: dg411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andre Lieven)
- Date: 26 Sep 2006 05:47:17 GMT
"Lee Jay" (ljfinger@xxxxxxx) writes:
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
1) Damaged shuttle docks to ISS
2) Stranded crew milks consumables from damaged shuttle until depleted
3) Stranded crew configures orbiter for unmanned undocking and remote-
controlled disposal or landing, depending on extent of damage
4) Rescue shuttle docks with ISS
5) Stranded crew comes home with rescue crew
Speaking of which, why doesn't NASA require the next Shuttle to be
stacked and ready for rollout before sending up the preceeding mission
in order to reduce the time before the rescue could occur? There must
be a reason, I just don't know what it is.
$$$$$. Remember that everything at that level costs at least millions
of dollars, and there aren't loads of spare millions lying around
over there.
This is also harder with a three ship Shuttle fleet, V/ a four
ship fleet, where the standard processing flows may well have
one ship just about ready to fly while another one is flying.
Jenkins, 3rd edition, shows a pic of two Orbiters passing
each other on their respective Mobile Launch Platforms, and
notes that having two on launchers is a rare event. And, that
was when there were four Orbiters in the fleet.
Andre
.
- References:
- Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- From: Eric
- Re: Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- From: Lee Jay
- Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- Prev by Date: Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Next by Date: Re: What determines when the shuttle has to return to earth?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- Next by thread: Re: Hypothetical shuttle rescue...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|