Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Mike <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:04:44 +0100
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:40:43 GMT, "Danny Dot" <don't.mail.me@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Is a retrieval flight cost effective? I am thinking the cost of the
retrieval flight is about as much as the cost of the hardware retrieved. It
might be cheaper to just build another satillite than to perform a
retrieval. Not to mention the risk to humal life to do the retrieval..
If they tried to build another Hubble, the lowest cost contractor,
(probably Walmart) would end up spending two years "accurately"
grinding a mirror, fully certify it as having 20-20 vision and we'd be
right back in 1990 again.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: modular aproach etc
- References:
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: modular aproach etc
- Prev by Date: Soyuz moving, why all three?
- Next by Date: Re: Astronauts like capsules
- Previous by thread: Re: modular aproach etc
- Next by thread: Re: modular aproach etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|