Re: modular aproach etc
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:54:01 -0400
"Mike" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d2i9i29em183unvmsehksovpdvjkot7mf4@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:40:43 GMT, "Danny Dot" <don't.mail.me@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Is a retrieval flight cost effective? I am thinking the cost of the
retrieval flight is about as much as the cost of the hardware retrieved.
It
might be cheaper to just build another satillite than to perform a
retrieval. Not to mention the risk to humal life to do the retrieval..
If they tried to build another Hubble, the lowest cost contractor,
(probably Walmart) would end up spending two years "accurately"
grinding a mirror, fully certify it as having 20-20 vision and we'd be
right back in 1990 again.
Actually when Hubble was built, another contractor built another mirror as a
backup and according to this article, it's now on loan to the Smithsonian's
National Air and Space Museum.
http://www.nasm.si.edu/exploretheuniverse/etu_a_mirror.htm
Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)
.
- References:
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Danny Dot
- Re: modular aproach etc
- From: Mike
- Re: modular aproach etc
- Prev by Date: Re: modular aproach etc
- Next by Date: Re: Astronauts like capsules
- Previous by thread: Re: modular aproach etc
- Next by thread: Re: modular aproach etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|