Russian Manned Spaceflight Goal

I worked with the Russians in 1993 when NASA was looking into buying a Soyuz
as the station's lifeboat. They told me their goal at the time was
permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. If they got some real
science back, great. But to them the Mir itself was a big science
experiment.

Part of me thinks we should do better -- i.e. explore the solar system
and/or do lot of science. The problem is the cost goes WAY up. Part of me
thinks permanent manned presence in space for the lowest cost possible might
not be a bad goal for NASA. With the current budget situation, this might
be as much as NASA can do. It certainly is an objective that is easy to
measure. The key is to look at how to get the cost down. As a minimum we
would learn a lot about what is needed to go to Mars someday.

Danny


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Russian Manned Spaceflight Goal
    ... permanent manned presence in space at minimum cost. ... But to them the Mir itself was a big science ... The problem is the cost goes WAY up. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: NASA moon trip video
    ... companies were asked how much it would cost to convert a spaceship reusable 10 times into something that a commercial spaceline could use. ... Although NASA should ensure that the companies are paying for the second set of specifications with the companies own money rather than as "cost overruns". ... Scientists wanting to perform research near the Earth will probably have to get another organisation to launch their satellites - a civilian one perhaps? ... We have not cut back the space science programmes such as New Horizons. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: Why is NASA still giving away flights on its own vomit comet?
    ... completely dismiss them as devoid of science. ... against joyrides, nor even against NASA paying for them -- I just think ... rather than mainly to NASA employees. ... cost fuel and time-to-overhaul. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Ares vs DIRECT
    ... "Ares III" and the general public will hardly notice. ... The principal difference is the substitution of RS-68 engines for SSMEs on the core stage (as NASA eventually did with the Ares V). ... I eventually discovered a set of the ACI Draft version of the ESAS Report which included the cost figures behind ESAS which was the first crack in the proposal which I found. ... The argument I heard was that the new LV costs needed to match Shuttle thereby providing sufficient work for the existing workforce. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Ares vs DIRECT
    ... "Ares III" and the general public will hardly notice. ... The principal difference is the substitution of RS-68 engines for SSMEs on the core stage (as NASA eventually did with the Ares V). ... ESAS Report which included the cost figures behind ESAS which was the ... Shuttle thereby providing sufficient work for the existing workforce. ...
    (sci.space.policy)