Re: were is Kim keller
- From: "Brian Gaff" <briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:03:25 GMT
There was also a lot more paranoia around at that time of course. I'm sure
more is now being revealed officially than he ever put on his site. Sad, but
there are always those with knee jerk reactions and they would lose face if
they changed their minds.
Its always good practice to ask before doing anything that affects others
in the field of publicity I found.
Brian
--
Brian Gaff - briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c9f85$477e5796$927a2cda$26784@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Jacques van Oene" <oene0072@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:477e3a5b$0$25500$9a622dc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Who nows what happend to
Kim Keller
Inspector, Fraternal Order of the Pad Rat
who was an active writer to this news group in 1999/2000
He had an ecxelent web site with great Shuttle photo's....
Where were you when he lost his job? Search Google Groups for "kim keller
fired" and you'll find this:
| Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
| From: "Kim Keller" <kekel...@xxxxxxxxxx>
| Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 03:07:45 GMT
| Local: Mon, Feb 18 2002 10:07 pm
| Subject: Re: Dear Woohoo:
| Thanks to all for your show of support. It's deeply appreciated. I do
want
| to expand a little on the facts surrounding my termination so everyone
| understands. As far as I can tell, NASA PAO had nothing to do with this.
My
| website and posts were evidently discovered while USA security was
| investigating another employee's computer abuse at work - that person
and I
| were both posting to the space.com bulletin board and I think that's how
| they got interested in me. I was fired because my postings about the
work we
| were doing allegedly gave away proprietary information, i.e. time
required
| to perform tasks and the number of personnel involved. USA felt this
info
| was of sufficient quantity to be considered damaging to company
interests. I
| didn't even realize what I was discussing could be considered that
useful to
| a potential competitor. But ignorance is no excuse, so they felt my
"crime"
| was serious enough to warrant firing. I appealed the decision, a lengthy
| process that just concluded last week, and lost. I did find out that my
| photos were not part of the problem, so I am thinking about putting them
| back on the web.
|
| Again, thanks for your support.
|
| -Kim-
Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: were is Kim keller
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: were is Kim keller
- References:
- were is Kim keller
- From: Jacques van Oene
- Re: were is Kim keller
- From: Jeff Findley
- were is Kim keller
- Prev by Date: Re: were is Kim keller
- Next by Date: Re: were is Kim keller
- Previous by thread: Re: were is Kim keller
- Next by thread: Re: were is Kim keller
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|