Re: Credible Challenger Closure

In article <67497fc6-211b-4df6-b928-5bd6b67e6b31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

After replying to any initial comments, or to any questions about the
photogrammetrics of the event, I would like to proceed to the
pertinent portion of the caption to be analyzed.

I don't see how this is a simple request. If it takes you more than one
post to make the request, it isn't a simple request.

This accident was put to bed over 20 years ago. I can't imagine why there
is any reason to microanalyse the documents at this date. No one
in their right mind has any belief that this wasn't anything other
than an accident.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Credible Challenger Closure
    ... pertinent portion of the caption to be analyzed. ... I don't see how this is a simple request. ... This accident was put to bed over 20 years ago. ... You can't reason with him. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Credible Challenger Closure
    ... pertinent portion of the caption to be analyzed. ... I don't see how this is a simple request. ... To quote Grace Corrigan on the tenth anniversary, ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)