Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:48 -0500
"Nicholas Fitzpatrick" <nfitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4796240e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<67497fc6-211b-4df6-b928-5bd6b67e6b31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After replying to any initial comments, or to any questions about the
photogrammetrics of the event, I would like to proceed to the
pertinent portion of the caption to be analyzed.
I don't see how this is a simple request. If it takes you more than one
post to make the request, it isn't a simple request.
This accident was put to bed over 20 years ago. I can't imagine why there
is any reason to microanalyse the documents at this date. No one
in their right mind has any belief that this wasn't anything other
than an accident.
maxon is a known net kook and a troll. You can't reason with him. Please
killfile him.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- From: maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- References:
- Credible Challenger Closure
- From: maxson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- From: Nicholas Fitzpatrick
- Credible Challenger Closure
- Prev by Date: Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- Next by Date: Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- Previous by thread: Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- Next by thread: Re: Credible Challenger Closure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|