Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion
From: Ian Woollard (junkmail_at_wolfkeeper.plus.com)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Previous message: Joe Strout: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- In reply to: Hans: "Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Next in thread: Paul E. Black: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
To: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:34:42 +0100
Hans wrote:
> Here is an article on the subject.
> http://www.spacedaily.com/news/physics-04w.html
>
> Almost sounds too good to be possible.
It is too good to be plausible. The flaw is that heating one half of a
quantum entangled pair destroys the quantum entanglement.
> Any comments ?
Any such propulsion system implies faster than light transmission of a
signal. I mean, how far away would the drive be when the heating
occured? There's no maximum distance. If the ion drive was at Pluto; it
would heat up right away. That's a signal.
There is *no* experimental proof of transmission of a signal using
quantum entanglement; and there are strong theoretical arguments that
show it cannot be achieved.
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Previous message: Joe Strout: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- In reply to: Hans: "Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Next in thread: Paul E. Black: "Re: Quantum entanglement propulsion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]