Re: Brute force re-entry

From: Rodney Kelp (Rodneykelp605_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/26/04 

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:29:09 -0400
To: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org

They could send up some solid fuel boosters that the shuttle could dock with
and use for braking. How how long would it take to brake from 18k mph to
about 200mph without exceeding 2 G's?

"Henry Spencer" <henry@spsystems.net> wrote in message
news:I2BKqG.1vu@spsystems.net...
> In article <4ofSc.425593$Gx4.392265@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> Lizerd <1@2.com.retro.com> wrote:
> >Early on in the space program, the space capsule used brute force
re-entry.
> >IE: it slammed into the upper atmosphere at high speed to slow down for
> >return.
>
> That is the only method anyone has ever used for reentry, from that day
> to this: atmospheric braking. The details have gotten fancier (in most
> cases), but the basic scheme of things has not.
>
> >The space shuttle is a lifting body.
> >Why can't it fly back???
>
> It does. The Apollo and Gemini capsules were lifting bodies too, by the
> way (and so is Soyuz). They all use aerodynamic lift to stretch their
> reentries out as much as they can. But there are severe fundamental
> limits to what can be done. Even pushing it as far as the shuttle orbiter
> does incurs serious penalties, notably a thermal protection system which
> is complicated and rather fragile compared to the simple and robust
> heatshields the capsules used.
>
> >If the shuttle hit the atmosphere slower, use aero braking and descend at
> >a shallower angle, the shuttle could return at a slower decent rate, and
not
> >be subjected to the high temptures.
>
> The longer, slower reentry the shuttle uses makes its thermal problems
> *worse*, not better. The prolonged baking is actually rather harder to
> handle than a quick blowtorching.
>
> In any case, this isn't a question of the shuttle being deliberately
> operated in some stupid, suboptimal way. It *already* uses aerodynamic
> lift as much as it can without melting something off.
> --
> "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
> -- George Herbert |
henry@spsystems.net 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/2004

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Brute force re-entry
    ... >stretch to try and use some of that energy to alter the spacecraft ... The Shuttle's angle of attack in the initial reentry thru max heating and I ... What the Shuttle needs, besides a new airline, is some small, incremental ... The payload separates and the OTV transfers the payload to its operational ...
    (sci.space.tech)
  • Re: SpaceShipOne and reentry heat
    ... > reentry heating shielding requirements are minimal like SS1. ... the shuttle manouvers using a completely ... Depending on whether the capsule had its own thruster system, ... or leaving the shuttle on orbit and just returning in the ...
    (sci.space.tech)
  • Re: Dont ya hate when...
    ... surviving re-entry, which is the problem. ... LOTS of large -and small- chunks of the shuttle survived reentry quite well, ... See, for example, the poignant discovery of that little cloth shoulder-patch ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Dont ya hate when...
    ... surviving re-entry, which is the problem. ... LOTS of large -and small- chunks of the shuttle survived reentry ... In the case of this particular satellite spokesmen for the DoD have ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Cost of slowing down?
    ... > Shuttle was a "failure" not because of this or that design choice, ... The concept of a flying reentry is a good one IMHO. ... more comfortable than a capsule reentry. ... A scaled down version of the shuttle, say of the size and weight of a CEV, ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)