Re: Carbon-carbon is...?

From: Peter Fairbrother (zenadsl6186_at_zen.co.uk)
Date: 12/28/04

  • Next message: John Schilling: "Re: Delta IV plume question"
    To: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org
    Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:23:07 +0000
    
    

    Len Lekx wrote:

    > Just out of curiosity...
    >
    > What is the carbon-carbon heat shielding on the leading edges and
    > nose of the Shuttle composed of? I'm assuming that part of it is a
    > grahpite-fiber cloth material, but is it embedded in a ceramic
    > material, or a high-temperature epoxy?

    It's carbon fibres embedded in amorphous[1] carbon.

    RCC (reinforced carbon-carbon) starts as carbon fibre cloth in phenolic
    resin, shaped and cured. This is then pyrolysed (heated white-hot in the
    absence of air), which decomposes the resin leaving some of the carbon from
    the resin behind in a sort of foamy carbon structure, with the unaffected
    carbon fibres still running through it.

    This is vaccuum-impregnated with furfuryl alcohol[2] and pyrolysed again,
    which leaves a bit more carbon behind. The impregnation and pyrolysis is
    repeated, usually twice more, until the final material has only few and
    small holes in it.

    RCC is light, strong, and will take huge temperatures, and take huge
    temperature shocks - but it is still almost pure carbon, and will burn in
    the air. For shuttle use it is coated in silicon carbide and silica to
    prevent burning.

    For use as the chambers of small to medium rocket motors it is sometimes
    coated with rhenium and/or iridium.

    RCC is said to be beyond home workshop construction, but I don't really see
    why, if you can get the required high temeratures. You might just be able to
    make it in a suitable microwave oven based furnace.

    Which reminds me, I must go down the sales and get some more microwave
    ovens; though Tesco and Asda both do cheap ones for £25 now, so maybe I
    won't bother.

    [1] amorphous, "without shape", here meaning that the carbon does not have a
    well-defined crystal structure, unlike eg diamond or graphite.

    [2] aka furfural alcohol - or perhaps with furfuryl furfurate, depending on
    who you read, which is a similarish but non-identical chemical, an ester of
    furfuryl alcohol and pyromucic (aka furoic) acid. I've never made RCC, maybe
    one is better, but I'd guess either would do about the same job.

    [3] names of chemicals are difficult. Where they exist I usually use common
    UK names and give common US names, eg furfuryl alcohol is a UK common name
    and furfural alcohol is a US common name; otherwise I use IUPAC names, which
    chemists use (I am a chemist); or ISO names (which are supposedly the
    "official" names, but there aren't enough of them, and hardly anyone uses
    them).

    Of course sometimes all these names will be the same - only I can't think of
    an example.

    -- 
    Peter Fairbrother
    

  • Next message: John Schilling: "Re: Delta IV plume question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Carbon arc -- now what?
      ... Apparently it used to be quite common to have a carbon-arc ... I have a carbon arc torch somewhere around here that I bought at Montgomery ... The other electrode holder held two ...
      (sci.engr.joining.welding)
    • Re: Off Topic - "An Inconvenient Truth"
      ... I agree with you on the merits of a carbon tax. ... it by a fee on the pollution of the common resource is ... I agree with most everything you've said Jordan. ... This is more likely with common ...
      (rec.arts.sf.written)
    • Re: graphite
      ... It is only a form of carbon. ... common forms. ... It happens to be a crystaline form where the crystals ... As for carbon being harmless, I think the nano-particles found in laser ...
      (rec.music.makers.squeezebox)
    • Re: X-based lifeforms
      ... Silicon is many times more common than carbon.. ... Well, I did, but in retrospect that was a bad thing to do given the ...
      (rec.arts.sf.written)