Re: ramjet/scramjet: what makes expanded gas to go out in the back not the fron
Cray74_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: dave.harper_at_gmail.com: "Re: Interplanetary communications protocols"
- Previous message: Paul Hovnanian P.E.: "Re: Interplanetary communications protocols"
- In reply to: John W. Landrum: "Re: ramjet/scramjet: what makes expanded gas to go out in the back not the fron"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: ramjet/scramjet: what makes expanded gas to go out in the back not the fron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
To: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org Date: 20 Jan 2005 05:16:02 -0800
John W. Landrum wrote:
> The aerospike scramjet has a different
> geometry. At takeoff the Venture Star
The VentureStar was to be a pure rocket from
ground to orbit. It does not have a scramjet
engine. It has an aerospike rocket engine.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
- Next message: dave.harper_at_gmail.com: "Re: Interplanetary communications protocols"
- Previous message: Paul Hovnanian P.E.: "Re: Interplanetary communications protocols"
- In reply to: John W. Landrum: "Re: ramjet/scramjet: what makes expanded gas to go out in the back not the fron"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: ramjet/scramjet: what makes expanded gas to go out in the back not the fron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]