Re: Did Huygens send JPEGS?
From: Thomas Womack (twomack_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Huygens shortlived?"
- Previous message: Aidan Karley: "Re: Huygens shortlived?"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Did Huygens send JPEGS?"
- Next in thread: Ian Stirling: "Re: Did Huygens send JPEGS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
To: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org Date: 22 Jan 2005 12:00:43 +0000 (GMT)
In article <IAoxG4.8K1@spsystems.net>,
Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> wrote:
>In article <41F112EB.587C0D01@eagle.ca>,
>G. R. L. Cowan <gcowan@eagle.ca> wrote:
>>The files now at http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/titanraw/index.htm
>>are 176-by-768 JPGs. Where the same terrain is in five or 10 frames,
>>it seems conceivable unprocessed bitmaps could somehow be combined
>>to yield a little more resolution, but I guess JPEG compression would
>>eliminate that possibility.
>
>Nobody sends unprocessed bitmaps, or even losslessly-compressed bitmaps,
>from planetary probes any more. Images are invariably compressed using
>JPEG, or variations thereon, before transmission.
The impression I get from the Cassini raw-images site at NASA is that
the images are losslessly compressed, except that if the compression
produces more than 1024 output values from two 1024-pixel lines, the
last ones are cut off. That produces a "comb" effect down the side of
the image which can easily be sorted out by interpolation, without
producing JPEG's block artefacts with their catastrophic effect on
many forms of image sharpening.
Tom
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Huygens shortlived?"
- Previous message: Aidan Karley: "Re: Huygens shortlived?"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Did Huygens send JPEGS?"
- Next in thread: Ian Stirling: "Re: Did Huygens send JPEGS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|