Re: radiation shielding for a habitat
Cray74_at_gmail.com
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Tom Clarke: "Re: Water Jet Rocket"
- Previous message: wbogen_at_visteon.com: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- In reply to: Alfred Montestruc: "radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Next in thread: Mike Combs: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Mar 2005 05:59:44 -0800
Alfred Montestruc wrote:
> How much is needed and of what type?
As a rule of thumb: a lot of mass.
> This winds up being about 23.1 to 33.92 foot thick ( 7.03-10.34
meters)
> of liquid water.
That's about correct. 14.7 pounds of mass per square inch should give
you radiation shielding on par with Earth's atmosphere.
> Is this a reasonable approximation?
Yes.
> Or does someone have a better reference with hopefully
> less massy shielding ideas?
You could use thinner shields of denser materials, and some layered
multi-material shields have certain advantages against different types
of penetrating radiation, but a ~30ft thick wall of water is a good
start.
> I am aware that this much will not be needed all the time, but even
for
> a radiation shelter this is pretty heavy.
I believe you can get substantial protection from most radiation
threats with, say, a meter or two of water. If you want a temporary
storm shelter, a big tank of water reaction mass is a good start. You
need the water for the engines, and it can serve as shielding, too.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
- Next message: Tom Clarke: "Re: Water Jet Rocket"
- Previous message: wbogen_at_visteon.com: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- In reply to: Alfred Montestruc: "radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Next in thread: Mike Combs: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|