Re: radiation shielding for a habitat
From: Mike Combs (mikecombs_at_nospam.com_chg_nospam_2_ti.retro.com)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Tom Kent: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Previous message: Mike Combs: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- In reply to: Alfred Montestruc: "radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:20:14 -0600
"Alfred Montestruc" <montestruc@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110872035.543253.75340@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> How much is needed and of what type?
Have a look at
http://lifesci3.arc.nasa.gov/SpaceSettlement/75SummerStudy/Design.html where
it's recommended that we use slag (which will be producing anyway) for
shielding.
http://lifesci3.arc.nasa.gov/SpaceSettlement/75SummerStudy/Chapt4.html#Shielding
-- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Member of the National Non-sequitur Society. We may not make much sense, but we do like pizza.
- Next message: Tom Kent: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Previous message: Mike Combs: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- In reply to: Alfred Montestruc: "radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: radiation shielding for a habitat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]