Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)
From: David Summers (david_at_ualmiles.com)
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: Tom Clarke: "Re: Water Jet Rocket"
- Previous message: Neruocomp_at_yahoo.com: "Re: What is the name?"
- In reply to: Gene P.: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Next in thread: D Schneider: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: D Schneider: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Gene P.: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Mar 2005 10:34:13 -0800
Then why don't we use such things on Earth? Nuclear power is WAY
cheaper in Mexico (or even Nevada compared to New York)!
The fact is, transmitting power via cables over long distances is
expensive. The grid uses nearby sources, not far away ones. Losses on
long distance power cables become very large very fast.
-David
- Next message: Tom Clarke: "Re: Water Jet Rocket"
- Previous message: Neruocomp_at_yahoo.com: "Re: What is the name?"
- In reply to: Gene P.: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Next in thread: D Schneider: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: D Schneider: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Gene P.: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: A Moon base is too far; an asteroid ship better alternative:)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|