Re: food (was Re: Running multiple HET in parallel?)



Snidely.too@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On  *our* dime.  When this changes, then *we* don't have to be
responsible for  their safety.

Why do we have to be responsible for their safety anyway? Is some big nanny in the sky going to shake her finger at us?


As their employer and outfitter, we have that responsibility.
Is that clear enough?

It's an argument by assertion. Clear, but completely unconvincing.

	Paul
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vicious Obsession
    ... >>want to bellitle ... >Some just point the finger never taking responsibility for themselves. ... Jan is laying low from "The Other White Meat site." ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Michael Vick Has Found Jesus!!!
    ... "I take full responsibility for my actions," Vick said. ... will I sit right here and point the finger and try to blame anybody else for ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)
  • RE: Value of certifications
    ... However, if you make it clear that the cert has expired, then it says ... the employer may doubt your dedication and commitment. ... a responsibility not to mislead the employer into thinking you're fully ... you either earn credits for proving continued professional ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: cant go to work tomorrow
    ... foremost, go the sickness route, that ensures you'll receive Statutory Sick ... job is making you ill or why it's responsible for your condition. ... want to look into the option of taking legal action against your employer. ... employers have a responsibility to ensure a safe work environment ...
    (uk.people.support.depression)
  • Re: Oil hits $132/bbl
    ... Only if the employer allows it ... the killfile is for people like you who've run out ... John Lansford, PE ... I call this personal responsibility. ...
    (misc.transport.road)