Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics
From: Richard Miller (richard_at_seasalter0.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: Paul C. Dickie: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Previous message: Mr. Buzzcut: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Maybe in reply to: Matthew Maddock: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Next in thread: *Good_Virus: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Reply: *Good_Virus: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:38:42 +0100
In message <2608cbad.0410092318.38132b29@posting.google.com>, Lord Valve
<lord_valve_2003@yahoo.com> writes
>Among his many accomplishments, this is perhaps George's greatest. Only
>those wholly ignorant of history will forget, for instance, how Bill
>Clinton so thoroughly sullied the great office.
Yeah, right.
Clinton lied about sex. No one died.
Bush lied and lied and lied about Iraq, bin Laden, 9/11, and tens of
thousands of people died as a direct result of his lies; and thousands
more will die in the coming months and years.
So of course, it is the guy who lied about sex who gets impeached.
-- Richard Miller
- Next message: Paul C. Dickie: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Previous message: Mr. Buzzcut: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Maybe in reply to: Matthew Maddock: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Next in thread: *Good_Virus: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Reply: *Good_Virus: "Re: Bayes revised: A summary of flaws found requiring rejection of Statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]