Re: The propotion mean...
From: Richard Ulrich (Rich.Ulrich_at_comcast.net)
Date: 12/09/04
- Next message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Handling recurrence in Survival analysis"
- Previous message: Christoph Int-Veen: "Handling recurrence in Survival analysis"
- In reply to: Jeff Chang: "The propotion mean..."
- Next in thread: Art Kendall: "Re: The propotion mean..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:28:23 -0500
On 7 Dec 2004 23:23:31 -0800, jeff.wcchang@msa.hinet.net (Jeff Chang)
wrote:
> Dear Sir
>
> Thank you to respond my question.
> Let me explain what the "propotion data" is.
Google works better, spelling "Proportion"
> Simple said that, mean the "percentage" data.
> All the data are between 0 to 1.
> something like the "Good percentage"(yield) or "bad percentage"(defect ratio)
> If my data belong to this type, can't I use ANOVA ?
You can just about always "use ANOVA." The question is,
who is going to complain, how severely?
Do the differences in proportions look like "equal intervals"?
- yeah, sometimes. IF all the proportions, in various subgroups,
are between 20% and 80%, the choice of model often doesn't
matter much.
BUT you won't find many statisticians who will defend the
arbitrary argument that the range 45-49% should be treated
as exactly the same "interval" as 1-5% and 95-99%.
Re-read your sources with that in mind.
-- Rich Ulrich, wpilib@pitt.edu http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
- Next message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Handling recurrence in Survival analysis"
- Previous message: Christoph Int-Veen: "Handling recurrence in Survival analysis"
- In reply to: Jeff Chang: "The propotion mean..."
- Next in thread: Art Kendall: "Re: The propotion mean..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|