Re: comparing slopes for significant difference
From: Scott Seidman (namdiesttocs_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Ray Koopman: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Previous message: Bruce Weaver: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- In reply to: Ben: "comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Mar 2005 17:20:52 GMT
Ben <benjamin.kenward@zoology.ox.ac.uk> wrote in
news:Xns961691E1DBB21benjaminkenwardzoolo@163.1.2.7:
> Unfortunately there is a
> complication. One of the individuals is missing a lot of data at the
> start of the period, which causes its regression line not to pass
> through the origin (and therefore creates an artifactual significant
> difference). For this particular parameter, it should by nature have
> value 0 at time 0 (and the intercepts of the regression for the other
> individuals do go pretty much right through 0).
Why don't you run a zero-intercept model, if you have reason and
justification to do so?
Scott
- Next message: Ray Koopman: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Previous message: Bruce Weaver: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- In reply to: Ben: "comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: comparing slopes for significant difference"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|