Re: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2005 07:48:55 -0700
Edd Grant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently writing my degree dissertation. I have performed an
> experiment which has obtained data from participants, the data
> contains opinions of the participants relating to 2 websites. An
> example question and answer is:
>
> Q: Do you feel that one of the websites provides better services than
> the other?
When the question is phrased that way, I would have been inclined
to answer "yes" or "no", and you would have to ask "which one?"
to the "yes" response to find out whether Site A or B was considered
to have "better services".
> Possible answers: Site A, Site B, Either, Neither
>
> The user is required to select one of the available answers which I
> believe makes this 'ordinal' data?
A hybrid of two binary (nominal) responses perhaps, but definitely
not "ordinal".
>
> I am looking for a method of analysing my data to enable me to answer
> the following question:
>
> Participants will, to some 'significant degree', find Website A to
> have offer better services. I realise that I need to define exactly
> what a 'significant degree' is and was hoping that there is some
> method I can use to do this? i.e. for a sample size of x, at least y
> candidates must give answer z for it to be statistically significant.
This kind of information is sometimes approached by asking questions
the respondants to rate the sites on a "likert" scale of 1 to 5, or
1 to 7, other others; or implicitly define your 'significant degree'
by putting it in your QUESTION to solicit:
Strongly Agree Agree Unable to Rate Disagree Strongly Disagree
>
> My sample size is 50 so quite small.
You should have a talk with those who use samples of size 1 to test
expensive items like nuclear bombs. "It's not the size that counts".
:-) Please don't try to run over me with your car if you see me
crossing a street.
> Does anyone know what methods I
> should be using here? So far I have looked at hypothesis testing but
> it seems no more useful in this scenario than simply looking at the
> number of responses for each site i.e. I can test the hypothesis that
> more people like website A than website B, but I can do that by
simply
> looking at the frequency of each response. I may have grossly
> misunderstood this so please let me know if I have overlooked
> something potentially useful here.
A sample survey course will help. You definitely need a mentor to
help you with the statistical elements of your dissertation.
>
> So, your thoughts and comments would be appreciated, I'm doing a S/W
> Engineering degree and am not familiar with many statistical terms so
> please go easy on me to begin with :-).
Thanks for the warning and tip. :^)
The remarks below are my global opinion on non-statisticians thinking
they can practice statistics (let alone well) by merely reading a
book or a chapter of a book on some statistical method, not realizing
that it takes as long to train a statistican to do his/her job
moderately well (say at the Ph.D. level of statistics) as it takes
a medical school to train a brain surgeon.
Would you let your good friend operate on your brain after s/he read
a book on brain surgery? :-)
I had posted this in ngs:
RF> Can you imagine what happens if every Tom, Dick and Harry start
RF> cutting up skulls in brain surgery after reading a paper back
RF> book on brain surgery? :-)
RF> My professional opinion about this statistical "mal-practice"
RF> was expressed in the flagship journal of the American Statistical
RF> Association (JASA 1982, 489-491) over two decades ago,
*> "I am less perturbed by the poor substantive quality of this
*> book than by the fact that we are witnessing the emergence of
*> a subculture of economists and social scientists, who are no
*> more qualified or equipped to practice statistics than law
*> law or medicine, yet who nonetheless do practice it among
*> their circles of nonstatisticians, without much visible signs
*> of protest from the community of statisticians. I feel
*> obliged to register my strongest protest against this type of
*> malpractice, < ... >"
> Thanks in advance of all your help.
>
> Edd
Nada.
-- Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- From: Edd Grant
- Re: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- References:
- Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- From: Edd Grant
- Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: variance across 2 independent experiments
- Next by Date: Re: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- Previous by thread: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Advice requested regarding method of data analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|