> Challenge
- From: Don Saklad <dsaklad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 04 Jun 2005 03:53:05 -0400
> Path: grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!
bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!
postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!
sn-xit-04!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!
corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
> From: "PaulKing" <aimulti at aimultimedia.com>
> Newsgroups: misc.health.aids
> Subject: Challenge
> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:51:13 -0400
> Organization: www.talkabouthealthnetwork.com
> Message-ID: <431b337a0657600e87b4f777796371e2 at
localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
> X-Newsreader: www.talkabouthealthnetwork.com
> X-Problems-To: info at talkaboutnetwork.com
> X-Posted-By: USERID-7496
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> X-Complaints-To: abuse at supernews.com
> Lines: 28
> Xref: grapevine.lcs.mit.edu misc.health.aids:98998
>
> CHALLENGE TO BELIEVERS
>
> If anyone still believes 'AIDS' statistics, let them answer
> just this one question.
>
> The high budget apathykills.org TV commercial claims 25 million
> children in the Third World have died of 'AIDS'.
>
> The UN figures (see graph from them I posted above) says that
> ONLY 3% of child mortalities in the Third World are from
> 'AIDS'.
>
> If 3% = 25 million then 100% must = 832.5 million.
>
> If nearly ONE BILLION children in the Third World have died
> then how come the population growth is at an all time high.
>
> ONE BILLION DEAD CHILDREN would almost mean every child in
> Africa and India is dead.
>
> Explain this and you can still believe 'AIDS' figures.
>
> Fail to do so and you must admit 'AIDS' figures are TOTAL
> GARBAGE.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Best Book on Econometrics
- Next by Date: New publication: Confidence intervals for probabilistic network classifiers
- Previous by thread: reliability
- Next by thread: New publication: Confidence intervals for probabilistic network classifiers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
