Re: LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- From: "John Uebersax" <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Nov 2005 14:48:36 -0800
This seems unusual.
With a 1-class model (and no missing data) estimation really needs just
one iteration, so convergence shouldn't be an issue there.
Suggestions:
1. Are data being read correctly? Is there a way to check--e.g., a
report of N's and means for each variable?
2. Can you run any benchmark data and verify that you get the right
results? That's a good way to make sure you've formatted data files
correctly, are using the proper options, etc.
3. Have you experimented with changing the convergence criterion
and/or maximum number of iterations?
4. If you're getting results (even though convergence isn't reached),
do they look plausible?
(This is my third attempt over a several-hour period to reply to the
post. If the reply ends up appearing multiple times, please excuse.)
--
John Uebersax, PhD
.
- References:
- LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- From: Danielle
- LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Stepwise with categorical variables
- Next by Date: Re: LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- Previous by thread: LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- Next by thread: Re: LCA: model failed to determine a valid solution...why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|