Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin)
- Date: 24 Nov 2005 10:55:32 -0500
In article <1132843929.037229.164490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Thom <t.s.baguley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Conceptually:
>Statistical significance = effect size x sample size
A far more correct statement is that the "statistical
significance" is approximately a function of the effect
size multiplied by the square root of the sample size.
Even this is not a good guide as to what action should
be taken. To get that, one should look upon the
problem as a decision problem.
>e.g., in concrete form
>t = d x (df^0.5)/2 ... (for independent t using Cohen's d)
>... as d or df increases t (and statistical significance) increases ...
>This is taken straight from Robert Rosenthal's book chapter in the
>Handbook of Research Synthesis.
>Thom
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Thom
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- References:
- significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: 2046
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Thom
- significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Prev by Date: Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Next by Date: Re: Comparing coefficients
- Previous by thread: Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Next by thread: Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|