Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: "Thom" <t.s.baguley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 03:32:07 -0800
>A far more correct statement is that the "statistical
>significance" is approximately a function of the effect
>size multiplied by the square root of the sample size.
That's certainly true, but I think the spirit of Rosenthal's conceptual
equation is to remind/educate researchers that statistical significance
is a function of both effect size and sample size.
Thom
.
- References:
- significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: 2046
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Thom
- Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- From: Herman Rubin
- significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparing different scales
- Next by Date: R^2 in NLS...non-sense??
- Previous by thread: Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Next by thread: Re: significance of correlation affected by sample size?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|