Re: Comparing different scales
- From: "John Uebersax" <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 13:14:01 -0800
I like Rich's suggestion about transforming the reaction time variable.
But, once that's done, I'm not yet convinced that there's a problem
with subtracting z scores.
True, with z scores you lose track of whatever mean difference might
exist between explicit and implicit self-esteem were both constructs
measured on a common scale. That is, suppose, averaged over all
people, implicit self-esteem is x "units" higher than explicit
self-esteem. You'd lose that information with z-score subtraction.
But if you're trying to correlate (ROSE - ISE) with other variables,
such an overall mean difference doesn't matter, does it?
A similar argument could be made for subtracting ranks on the two
variables.
--
John Uebersax PhD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparing different scales
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: Comparing different scales
- References:
- Comparing different scales
- From: Uri
- Comparing different scales
- Prev by Date: Re: Gamma Correlation pro's & con's
- Next by Date: Re: Gamma Correlation pro's & con's
- Previous by thread: Re: Comparing different scales
- Next by thread: Re: Comparing different scales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading