Re: Sample vs Population Question
- From: "John_Kane" <John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2005 13:42:58 -0800
t.mccreight@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I used age as the common variable because all respondents supplied
> that. Mean age for those not providing salary was 48.6;for those
> providing salary it was 41.1.
>
> SPSS gave me those 3 lovely zeros after the decimal point in the
> significance column.
Well, with a sample size of about 2000 you have a lot of power. Is
there any strong reason to think that a mean age difference of 7.5
years is likely to be of substantive significance given the age
distribution of the entire sample?
John Kane, Kingston ON Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sample vs Population Question
- From: Tim McCr8
- Re: Sample vs Population Question
- References:
- Sample vs Population Question
- From: t . mccreight
- Re: Sample vs Population Question
- From: John_Kane
- Re: Sample vs Population Question
- From: t . mccreight
- Sample vs Population Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this normal?
- Next by Date: Re: Sample vs Population Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Sample vs Population Question
- Next by thread: Re: Sample vs Population Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|