Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- From: "John Uebersax" <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jul 2006 09:44:31 -0700
So, to make things as simple as possible for the OP, who is not a
statistician, my (provisional) conclusion is as follows:
1. Eliminate cells 3 and 4 from consideration. This is equivalent
to testing a hypothesis about the equality of two *conditional*
probabilities--i.e. let
p1 = pi[1|~(3,4)] = conditional probability of choice 1 given
not(choice 3 or choice 4)
p2 = pi[2|~(3,4)] = conditional probability of choice 2 given
not(choice 3 or choice 4)
Null hypothesis (H0): p1 = p2 = .5
2. Denote the frequencies of the two remaining cells f1 and f2.
3. Let e1 = e2 = (f1 + f2)/2
4. Calculate either the regular Pearson chi-squared or the LR
chi-squared statistic. As the former is more familiar, that might
be better. The formula is just:
X^2 = SUM {[f(i) - e(i)]^2 / e(i)} = 4.298
if I programmed it correctly. I suggest you do the calculations
yourself.
5. Evaluate the statistical significance of this chi-squared
statistic with 1 df. The value my program gave was .0382.
Assuming this is all correct, then an exact test based on the
cumulative binomial is also possible.
--
John Uebersax PhD
.
- References:
- Test for proportions difference - same sample
- From: siubo
- Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- From: John Uebersax
- Test for proportions difference - same sample
- Prev by Date: Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- Next by Date: Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- Previous by thread: Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- Next by thread: Re: Test for proportions difference - same sample
- Index(es):