Re: how to interpret a conditional probability
- From: "David Jones" <dajxxx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:00:30 +0100
Takashi Yamauchi wrote:
"David Jones" <dajxxx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageafter
news:44fc55d4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Takashi Yamauchi wrote:
I wonder if you could help me and point me to somewhere.
this is a simple question (I think), but not for me.
Say, you estimated a conditional probability
P(theta_1 | x) = 0.54,
THETA = {theta_1, theta_2}, wehre P(theta_1)=P(theta_2)=0.5.
So, Theta is dichotomous (yes, no), x is data/observation, and the
prior
probabilities are 0.5. This conditional probability means that
posterior
observation x, the probability of P(theta_1 | x) improved only
slightly
(compared to the prior P(theta_1) = 0.5).
How do you evaluate this conditional probability? Any index to say
something statistically? For example, you can caculate the
Thank you. Can I use the Bayes factor? such thatodds for theta_1;
0.54/(1-0.54) or take the logorithm of the odds. Then, how do you
evaluate
these statistically? Is there any way to evluate how much 0.54 is
informative (statistically)? where should I look?
Thank you
takashi
One approach would be to extend the discussion to a fully defined
decision problem. The "optimal" decision depends on the probability
distribution, as does the expected cost. Thus you could measure how
useful the observation x is, by comparing the expected costs before
and after the observation. This is on the basis that "money" is
easier to understand/compare than probabilities or odds.
David Jones
P(x | theta_1) / P(x | theta_2) = Bayes factor
If so, how do I interpret the Bayes factor? Do you know of a good
paper/book that discusses the interpretation of Bayes factor?
takashi yamauchi
I have two thoughts on this question: (i) it has nothing to do with
your original question; (ii) it has everything to do with your
original question. This may be because you need to decide exactly what
you question is, but also, quite a lot, because of my limited
familiarity with all this.
A suggestion for a good source of information about (fairly current)
Bayesian ideas is the book:
Bernardo JM and Smith AFM (2000) Bayesian Theory. Wiley, Chichester
David Jones
.
- References:
- how to interpret a conditional probability
- From: Takashi Yamauchi
- Re: how to interpret a conditional probability
- From: David Jones
- Re: how to interpret a conditional probability
- From: Takashi Yamauchi
- how to interpret a conditional probability
- Prev by Date: comparing prediction accuracy between two MLR models
- Next by Date: Re: Stationary means
- Previous by thread: Re: how to interpret a conditional probability
- Next by thread: conditional probability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading